Results
p90Rsk2 directly interacts with Emi1
Since p90
Rsk2 and Emi1 are both involved in cytostatic activity
in
Xenopus eggs, we initially investigated whether they are also
present in mouse eggs. RT–PCR analysis from metaphase-arrested oocytes
revealed that p90
Rsk2 and Emi1 are both present at the mRNA
level (data not shown). Both proteins were detected in mouse oocytes by
Western blot (
Figure
1A) and immunofluorescence analyses showed that they were diffuse in
the cytoplasm (
Figure
1B). Moreover, both Emi1 and p90
Rsk2 seemed to decorate the
meiotic spindle (
Figure
1B, insets), suggesting that they could partially colocalize.
Next, we investigated whether Emi1 and p90Rsk2 physically
interact. The mouse Emi1 homologue was cloned by RT–PCR from a 13 days
postcoitum (dpc) embryo library and its identity was verified by direct
sequencing. HA-tagged p90Rsk2 and myc-tagged Emi1 were
expressed in Hek293 cells either alone or in combination. When cell
extracts were immunoprecipitated with anti-myc antibody, p90Rsk2
was specifically co-immunoprecipitated with myc-Emi1 (Figure
2A). Interestingly, we found that Emi1 also co-immunoprecipitated with
the endogenous APC activator Cdc20, and that coexpression of p90Rsk2
increased this association (Figure
2A).
Hence, we analysed the regions of Emi1 required for this interaction
using pull-down experiments with purified GST-Emi1 proteins. Emi1 contains
an N-terminal region (aa 1–181 in mouse Emi1) upstream of the degradation
box (F-box, aa 182–236) and a C-terminal region that contains a
zinc-binding motif rich in cysteines (aa 313–383). Mitotic cyclins bind to
the N-terminal region of Xenopus Emi1, whereas both the
N-terminal and the C-terminal regions of Emi1 interact with Cdc20 (Reimann
et al, 2001a). Remarkably, only the C-terminal region of Emi1
acts as a Cdc20 inhibitor and is necessary and sufficient for the
cytostatic activity of Xenopus eggs (Reimann
et al, 2001a; 2001b;
Reimann and Jackson, 2002). We
found that p90Rsk2 bound to full-length Emi1 and to both
GST-Emi11–181 and GST-Emi1236–383, albeit
interaction with the C-terminal region was stronger (Figure
2C). Interestingly, while the cysteine-rich motif of mouse Emi1 was
required for efficient binding to Cdc20, its deletion did not affect the
interaction with p90Rsk2 (see GST-Emi1236–313 in
Figure 2D), indicating that the kinase binds a different site in the
C-terminus of Emi1.
p90Rsk2 phosphorylates Emi1 and promotes its interaction with
Cdc20
To test whether Emi1 was a substrate for p90
Rsk2, we incubated
a purified active form of p90
Rsk2 with purified GST-Emi1
in
vitro. As shown in
Figure 3A, GST-Emi1, but not GST alone, was readily phosphorylated by
the kinase. Moreover, we found that p90
Rsk2 phosphorylated
GST-Emi1
236–383 much more efficiently than GST-Emi1
1–181,
and that the region of Emi1 upstream of the zinc-finger motif was
sufficient for phosphorylation (GST-Emi1
236–313 in
Figure 3B). An analysis of the known Emi1 gene sequences revealed that
there are only four serine/threonine residues that are conserved between
amino acids 236 and 313: ser246, thr251, thr304 and ser310 (
Figure
3C). Single substitutions of these residues with alanine showed that
only ser246 and thr251 are substrates for p90
Rsk2 (
Figure
3D). Moreover, p90
Rsk2 could still phosphorylate a GST-Emi1
236–302
fusion protein but not GST-Emi1
294–383 (
Figure
3B). However, even when a double mutation ser246ala/thr251ala (ST/AA)
was produced, phosphorylation of GST-Emi1
236–313 was decreased
but not abolished (
Figure
3D), indicating that additional, nonconserved residues between amino
acids 236 and 302 of Emi1 are substrates for p90
Rsk2 in
vitro.
Since p90Rsk2 interacts with and phosphorylates Emi1
upstream of the binding site for Cdc20, we asked whether it influenced
their interaction. GST-Emi1 full length was bound to GSH-agarose beads and
incubated for 30 min in the absence or presence of purified p90Rsk2
to obtain nonphosphorylated or phosphorylated sources of the protein (see
Figure 3A). At the end of the incubation, beads were washed and the
kinase removed, as demonstrated by Western blot analysis (third panel).
Hence, beads were incubated with extracts of proliferating Hek293 cells,
which express high levels of Cdc20. As expected, GST-Emi1 was able to bind
to Cdc20; however, phosphorylation by p90Rsk2 strongly
increased this interaction (approximately four-fold;
Figure 4A). The same effect of phosphorylation by p90Rsk2
was observed when a GST-Emi1236–383 was used (Figure
4B), confirming that the action of p90Rsk2 is exerted on
the region of Emi1 that is necessary and sufficient for its cytostatic
activity (Reimann et al,
2001a). Remarkably, the effect of phosphorylation by p90Rsk2
was completely suppressed when the GST-Emi1236–383ST/AA mutant
(ser246ala/thr251ala) was used for Cdc20 binding assays (Figure
4C). These results suggest that phosphorylation by p90Rsk2
stabilizes the interaction of Emi1 with Cdc20.
Emi1 and p90Rsk2 cooperate to induce the metaphase arrest of
Hek293 cells
Since phosphorylation of Emi1 by p90
Rsk2 increases its ability
to interact with Cdc20 and this interaction prevents activation of the
APC, we asked if p90
Rsk2 could augment the cytostatic activity
of Emi1
in vivo. To this end, we transfected Hek293 cells with
constructs for p90
Rsk2 and Emi1 either alone or in combination.
In addition, cells were cotransfected with a GFP construct (1:10) to
identify transfected cells. After 24 h from transfection, cells were
fixed, stained with Hoechst and analysed for the percentage of mitotic
cells in the GFP-positive population. Control cells transfected with empty
vectors displayed 5% of GFP-positive cells in either prometaphase or
metaphase (
Figure
5A and B); overexpression of Emi1 caused an increase of mitotic cells
to 12%, similar to that observed previously for
Xenopus Emi1 (
Reimann
et al, 2001a). Interestingly, we observed that coexpression
of Emi1 with p90
Rsk2 led to a further increase in mitotic cells
(24%). This effect is similar to that obtained with a stabilized Emi1
mutant (
Reimann et al, 2001a)
and suggests that the two proteins cooperate to delay or arrest Hek293
cells in mitosis. Overexpression of p90
Rsk2 alone also caused a
small increase in mitotic index (9 versus 5% in control cells), which
could be due to an effect of the kinase on endogenous Emi1.
To confirm that overexpression of Emi1 and p90Rsk2 caused a
mitotic arrest in Hek293 cells, we analysed cyclin B1 expression levels
and H1 kinase activity. GFP-positive and GFP-negative cells were sorted by
FACS, and protein expression was tested in the two populations.
Overexpression of Emi1 stabilized cyclin B1 and p90Rsk2 further
increased the levels of cyclin B1 (Figure
5C and D). Stabilization of cyclin B1 was already appreciated when p90Rsk2
was transfected alone, further suggesting an effect of p90Rsk2
on endogenous Emi1. Moreover, cyclin B1 increase in cells cotransfected
with Emi1 and p90Rsk2 was accompanied by MPF activation (Figure
5C, fourth panel, and
Figure 5D). These results support the hypothesis of cooperation
between these proteins to induce the metaphase arrest.
Emi1 and p90Rsk2 cooperate to induce metaphase arrest of
early blastomeres
CSF activity has been defined by the ability of purified proteins and/or
extracts to induce cell cycle arrest when microinjected into dividing
blastomeres. To examine the cooperation between p90
Rsk2 and
Emi1 by this classical bioassay, we microinjected these purified proteins
into one blastomere of mouse two-cell embryos (
Masui,
2001). We found that microinjection of GST-Emi1
236–383 did
not exert a cytostatic effect in mouse embryos, which developed to the
four-cell stage as control (not shown) or GST-injected embryos (
Figure
6B). On the other hand, microinjection of an active form of p90
Rsk2
was able to induce the typical three-cell stage arrest in 42% of
microinjected embryos (
Figure
6A and B). Remarkably, when p90
Rsk2 was coinjected with
GST-Emi1
236–383, the cytostatic effect was strongly increased
(66% arrest at the three-cell stage), indicating cooperation between the
two proteins
in vivo. By contrast, GST-Emi1
236–383ST/AA
did not reinforce the kinase action, indicating that phosphorylation on
the conserved ser/thr residues of Emi1 is important for the cooperative
effect (
Figure
6B).
Since we found that GST-Emi1236–313 is phosphorylated by p90Rsk2
and is sufficient for interaction with the kinase but does not interact
with Cdc20, we reasoned that this portion could interfere with binding of
endogenous Emi1 in vivo and could compete as substrate for p90Rsk2.
Indeed, in transfected cells, coexpression of Emi1236–313 not
only competed with the interaction between full-length Emi1 and p90Rsk2
but also prevented association of Cdc20 with the kinase (Figure
6C), suggesting that it blocks the formation of a stable complex
between Emi1/Cdc20 and p90Rsk2. Moreover, we found that
coinjection of GST-Emi1236–313 in two-cell embryos inhibited
the cytostatic effect exerted by p90Rsk2, with only 8% of
injected embryos blocked at the three-cell stage (Figure
6A and B).
Interaction between p90Rsk2 and Emi1 is required during
oocyte maturation
Since GST-Emi1
236–313 acts as an inhibitor of the functional
interaction between p90
Rsk2 and Emi1
in vivo, we set
out to determine the role of this interaction during oocyte maturation,
when cytostatic activity is physiologically established. Oocytes at the
germinal vesicle stage were allowed to undergo germinal vesicle breakdown
(GVBD) in culture. After GVBD, oocytes were microinjected with either GST
as control or GST-Emi1
236–313 and incubated for additional
12–14 h to complete maturation. Control or GST-injected oocytes reached
the metaphase II arrest typical of ovulated oocytes; the chromosomes were
aligned at the equator of the meiotic spindle, which was located at the
periphery of the cell (
Figure
7A, Ba, b and C). On the contrary, microinjection of GST-Emi1
236–313
caused abnormal maturation, with 30% of the oocytes extruding a second
polar body (
Figure
7A and C). Interestingly, in some oocytes, the polar body was much
larger than normal (
Figure
7A), indicating a defect in asymmetric division similar to that
observed in
mos−/− oocytes (
Choi
et al, 1996;
Verlhac
et al, 2000b). Immunofluorescence analysis of GST-Emi1
236–313-injected
oocytes revealed either abnormal spindles with misaligned chromosomes (
Figure
7Bc and d) or the absence of a meiotic spindle and completion of
anaphase (
Figure
7Be). On the other hand, the GST-Emi1
236–313ST/AA mutant
did not cause alterations of meiotic progression (
Figure
7Bf and C), suggesting that it was unable to interfere with Emi1
phosphorylation
in vivo. These results highlight the lack of a
normal metaphase II arrest in oocytes injected with wild-type GST-Emi1
236–313
and indicate that the functional interaction between Emi1 and p90
Rsk2
is required for normal meiotic progression.
RNAi of Emi1 interferes with mouse oocyte maturation
To test whether the morphological defects observed in maturing oocytes
injected with the GST-Emi1
236–313 were due to alterations of
Emi1 function, we set out to interfere with RNA expression in oocytes by
RNAi. It was shown that microinjection of 300–500 bp double-stranded RNA
(dsRNA) sequences in maturing mouse oocytes is capable of specifically
depleting endogenous mRNAs (
Svoboda
et al, 2000). Thus, we
in vitro synthesized dsRNAs
comprising the 3′ region of mouse Emi1 mRNA, or of GFP mRNA as control,
and microinjected them into GV oocytes. Oocytes were allowed to mature and
Emi1 mRNA levels were measured in GFPdsRNA- or Emi1dsRNA-injected oocytes.
As shown in
Figure 8A, Emi1 mRNA was readily detected in GFPdsRNA-injected
oocytes, whereas it was absent in Emi1dsRNA-injected oocytes.
Interestingly, depletion of Emi1 caused similar morphological defects as
those observed by injection of GST-Emi1
236–313. We observed
that 30% of Emi1dsRNA-injected oocytes extruded a second polar body (
Figure
8C and Bb) or a much larger polar body indicating the lack of
asymmetric division as reported for
mos−/− oocytes (
Figure
8Bc and d), whereas 60% of the oocytes displayed abnormal spindles
with scattered chromosomes or decondensed chromatin (
Figure
8Bc, d and C). By contrast, GFPdsRNA-injected oocytes underwent normal
maturation and arrested with a metaphase II spindle (
Figure
8Ba and C). These results indicate that oocyte maturation was severely
impaired by selectively interfering with Emi1 expression in mouse oocytes.